Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Chamberlin v. Alves
as 24-1340
Petitioner:
PETER MARK CHAMBERLIN
Respondent:
NELSON ALVES, Superintendent
Chamberlin v. Alves
as 4:2023cv40036
Plaintiff:
Peter Mark Chamberlin
Defendant:
Superintendent Nelson B Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doster v. Kendall
as 8:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
Hunter Doster
Defendant:
Frank Kendall
Petitioner:
Dr. Peter Marks
BRAKE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22946
Plaintiff:
PETER MARK BRAKE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodricus Scott v. Jared Akins, et al
as 22-12499
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODRICUS D. SCOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
JARED AKINS, Statesboro Police Department, individual and official capacities, TYSHEA CHARDAE LEE, Grand Juror, FRANCES JEANETTE MONTERO, Grand Juror and others
Scott v. Superior Court of Bulloch County et al
as 6:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Rodricus D. Scott
Defendant:
Superior Court of Bulloch County, Bulloch County Sheriff Office/Bulloch County Jail, Judge June Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coca v. Williams et al
as 2:2020cv01494
Petitioner:
Peter Mark Coca
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Warden Brian Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chamberlin v. Medeiros
as 1:2017cv11544
Petitioner:
Peter Mark Chamberlin
Respondent:
Sean Medeiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Singer v. David Heckler, et al
as 17-2491
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES M. SINGER
Defendant:
DAVID HECKLER, Chairman of the Pennsylvania Child Protection Task Force et.al., DAVID TYLER, SANDRA STONER, Esq. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PETER MARKS, Esq., RUTH DUNNEWOLD, Esq., JUDITH SCHULDER, Esq. and others
GLUNK v. NOONE et al
as 1:2016cv01147
Plaintiff:
Richard P. Glunk
Defendant:
Joyce McKeever , Ollice Bates, Jr. , Kerry Maloney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
