Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Ballard v. County of Rockland et al
as 7:2024cv02944
Plaintiff:
Wayne Ballard
Defendant:
County of Rockland, Thomas E. Walsh, II, Peter Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell et al v. Walker et al
as 2:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Mary Elizabeth Campbell and Lawrence Campbell
Defendant:
Amir Peter Walker, Epic Logistics LLC and Mid-Continent Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
McSweeney v. Walker
as 4:2019cv03448
Defendant:
Peter Walker
Plaintiff:
Teresa M McSweeney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Peter Walker v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 2:2019cv03218
Plaintiff:
Peter Walker
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lopes v. Dickhaut, et al
as 16-2119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANILO LOPES
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent, ANTHONY MENDONSA, THOMAS M. TOCCI and others
Defendant:
JOHN BELAND, PETER WALKER, RANDY FISHER and others
Freeman May v. John Tywalk, et al
as 16-1725
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREEMAN WILLIAM MAY, PADRP
Defendant:
JOHN C. TYWALK, DAVID J. ARNOLD, JR., District Attorney, STEWART LEV, Esquire and others
MAY v. TYWALK et al
as 2:2016cv00130
Plaintiff:
FREEMAN WILLIAM MAY
Defendant:
JOHN C. TYWALK, DAVID ARNOLD, JR., STEWART LEV and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. HAVERFORD TWP POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2015cv04850
Plaintiff:
PETER WALKER
Defendant:
HAVERFORD TWP POLICE DEPT., THOMAS F. SCARPATO, JR., JEFFREY STEIGEWALT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAY v. TYLWALK et al
as 2:2014cv01340
Plaintiff:
FREEMAN W. MAY
Defendant:
JOHN C. TYLWALK, ROBERT J. EBY, BRADFORD H. CHARLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
