Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Ashford et al v. DeKalb County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2026cv00042
Plaintiff:
Gerline Ashford and Dakota Ashford
Defendant:
DeKalb County, Tennessee, Patrick Ray, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jeffery et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11860
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Mine Respirator Company LLC and others
Plaintiff:
John Jeffery, Shane Dee Jenkins, Monica Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv03318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
RAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv04086
Plaintiff:
PATRICK RAY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RAY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21162
Plaintiff:
PATRICK RAY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SEBASTIAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20574
Plaintiff:
PATRICK RAY SEBASTIAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin v. Abdullah et al
as 2:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ray Martin
Defendant:
J Abdullah, B Andrews, B Bass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Henderson County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2022cv01094
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ray
Defendant:
Henderson County, Tennessee, Judge Steve Beal, 26th District Public Defender's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Quici
as 21-50468
Defendant / Appellant:
Patrick Anthony Quici, also known as Patrick Ray Quinci
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Glenn v. USA
as 1:2021cv00057
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Patrick Ray Glenn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
