Cases 1 - 10 of 2,533
Smith-Catchings v. Tripp et al
as 4:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Xavier Lushun Smith-Catchings
Defendant:
Chris Tripp, Rebecca Bowker, Brad Peterson and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cannon v. Peterson
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lamar Cannon
Defendant:
E Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horn v. Peterson et al
as 6:2024cv06049
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lemuel Horn
Defendant:
Mrs. Peterson, Lieutenant Martin and Sergeant Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson et al. v. Willoughby Hills P.D. et al.
as 1:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
Isaac Peterson and Latoya Brisco
Defendant:
Willoughby Hills P.D., Officer Boepple, Officer Coninenza and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Quarles v. Youngkin et al
as 3:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
Allan Quarles
Defendant:
James Youngkin, Eric Wiltrout, C.O. Trouchin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Gary Glenn Peterson
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Peterson v. Wright et al
as 3:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
DeAndrey Peterson
Defendant:
Steven Wright, Hannah Evans, J Pugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patton v. Ealey et al
as 5:2024cv10771
Plaintiff:
Steven Patton
Defendant:
Tina Ealey, R. Green, Peterson and others
Peterson v. Landhandle
as 1:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
Isaac Peterson
Defendant:
Sheriff Kasey Landhandle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETERSON v. ACCHIONE et al
as 2:2024cv04347
Plaintiff:
LEVAUNT PETERSON
Defendant:
K. ACCHIONE and S.C.O. M. MCDONALD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
