Cases 51 - 60 of 3,373
MARELL v. PITTAK et al
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
BETHANY MARELL
Defendant:
OFFICER JOE PITTAK, OFFICER BRYCE BATLING, OFFICER MAKAYLA ELDRIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Gore et al
as 4:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Larry Coleman
Defendant:
Gore, Dowdy, Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Archuleta v. Phelps et al
as 1:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Racheal Archuleta
Defendant:
Matthew Phelps, James LaPorte and Joel Holt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kristen v. Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines, Ltd.
as 1:2024cv20579
Plaintiff:
Ms. Phelps Kristen
Defendant:
Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dohrman et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Duane Dohrman, Donald McCain, Joanne McMahon and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Phelps v. Parole Board Post-Prison
as 6:2023cv01950
Petitioner:
Ray Lawrence Phelps
Respondent:
Parole Board Post-Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Phelps Oil and Gas v. Noble Energy, et al
as 24-1005
Plaintiff:
PHELPS OIL AND GAS, LLC, on behalf of itself and a class of similarly situated royalty owners
Defendant:
NOBLE ENERGY INC. and DCP MIDSTREAM, LP
Phelps v. DOE et al
as 4:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Briggett C Phelps
Defendant:
Yolanda DOE, CEO of E.A.H. Housing, Angela DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Taylor v. Gore et al
as 4:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Larnell Taylor
Defendant:
Gore, Dowdy, Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
