Cases 1 - 10 of 36,478
Adams v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03497
Plaintiff:
James Phillip Adams
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wethington v. Parris et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wethington
Defendant:
Mike Parris, Stacy Oaks, Shawn Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. D&T Transportation Services, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Edie Phillips
Defendant:
D&T Transportation Services, LLC, Lance Blake Moore, Progressive Gulf Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Roberts v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02167
Plaintiff:
Joseph Roberts
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Former CPD Sergeant Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Zakrajsek et al
as 1:2024cv00239
Defendant:
John Doe, Drew Zakrajsek, Ohio Lumex Co., Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Phillips
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
Littles et al v. GSC Wholesale, LLC
as 4:2024cv01767
Plaintiff:
Kegan Lee-Neal Littles, Tara L. Phillips and Terrell Sherman
Defendant:
GSC Wholesale, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
(HC) Velasco Perez v. Phillips
as 1:2024cv00554
Petitioner:
Alfonso Velasco Perez
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. David Phillips
as 24-6456
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DAVID NEIL PHILLIPS, a/k/a Neil Phillips
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Defendant:
Warden FNU Coger, Warden FNU Gould, Warden FNU Feazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leib-Podry v. Tobias
as 24-1248
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP LEIB-PODRY
Defendant:
GEOFFREY TOBIAS, PRINCETON INSURANCE COMPANY, MEDPRO GROUP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
