Cases 31 - 40 of 3,059
Pittman v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Kim Antonio Pittman
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (SSID)
Drake v. FedEx Ground Package System Inc
as 3:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System Inc, Molly Smith, Arthur William Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
David Patterson v. David Spence
as 24-6205
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. PATTERSON
Defendant:
DAVID SPENCE, JUDGE HARRELL, DALLAS ROSE and others
Pittman et al v. NGM Insurnace Company
as 2:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
DAVID PITTMAN and KRISTIN PITTMAN
Defendant:
Deanne B. Criswell and NGM Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072 Payment of Flood Insurance Claim
Stark-Pittman v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00899
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Stark-Pittman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rich v. Ceiss et al
as 5:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
JT Rich
Defendant:
Cortnie Ciess, Jerry Hurburger, Cheyenne Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PITTMAN et al v. LIFECELL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv01083
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY PITTMAN and ANNA DUNGAN-PITTMAN
Defendant:
LIFECELL CORPORATION and ALLERGAN USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ALLEN v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
FDOC, DONALD LEAVINS, CHARLES RICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. United states Government
as 1:2024cv01127
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
United states Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Terry Frederick v. Meagan Ramsey
as 24-6130
Plaintiff:
TERRY ANTOINE FREDERICK
Defendant:
MEAGAN RAMSEY, LT. TOMSON, LT. STINE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
