Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
FATA v. LEHIGH COUNTY et al
as 5:2026cv05019
Plaintiff:
ABRAHIM FATA
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY, WARDEN KYLE A. RUSSELL, INVESTIGATOR CLIFF KNAPPENBERGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08856
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Washington v. State of Connecticut
as 26-1869
Defendant:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., STATE OF CONNECTICUT, KEVIN GENE DUBAY and others
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE LOIS WASHINGTON and BASIL CLIFTON WASHINGTON
KELLY v. GREGOR et al
as 3:2026cv04558
Plaintiff:
BRANDON L KELLY
Defendant:
TRENT A GREGOR, RAMSWELL, C O YOUNG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KELLY v. PETERSON et al
as 3:2026cv04556
Plaintiff:
BRANDON L KELLY
Defendant:
KENNETH J PETERSON, GREGORY M HOLCOMB, JOHNATHAN L PATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KELLY v. GREGER et al
as 3:2026cv04557
Plaintiff:
BRANDON LEE KELLY
Defendant:
TRENT A GREGER, JEREMY HALL COOKE, RICKY DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Snyder v. OH, et al
as 26-3586
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW SNYDER
Defendant:
STATE OF OHIO, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION, JAY FORSHEY, Warden, in his Private and Occupational Capacity and others
Earnest Pittman, Jr. v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 26-2296
Petitioner:
Earnest Lee Pittman, Jr.
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, FMC Rochester and Jared Rardin, Warden
Doe v. Pittman et al
as 2:2026cv00104
Plaintiff:
Doe
Defendant:
Mark T Pittman, Pam Bondi, Scott Bessant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
