Cases 1 - 10 of 3,049
Pittman v. Harris et al
as 2:2024cv02267
Not Yet Classified:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
Shanitha Pittman
Defendant:
Michael Amos Harris, M.A.D.E. Creations, Inc., RJ Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Phillips v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv02265
Plaintiff:
Herman Phillips
Defendant:
Governor William Lee, David Rausch, Frank Strada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Camus, et al. v. Sharp Healthcare
as 24-2520
Plaintiff:
HANNAH COUSIN, DEANNA FRANKLIN-PITTMAN, LINDA CAMUS and others
Defendant:
SHARP HEALTHCARE
Cousin, et al. v. Sharp Healthcare
as 24-2511
Plaintiff:
HANNAH COUSIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LINDA CAMUS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, DEANNA FRANKLIN-PITTMAN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
SHARP HEALTHCARE
Pittman v. Pickett, et al
as 24-1153
Plaintiff:
EMANUEL PITTMAN
Defendant:
PICKETT, C/O, FONTEROT, C/O, PLATO, C/O and others
Pittman III v. Leidos, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Milford Maurice Pittman III
Defendant:
Leidos, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Pittman v. Fulton County Police Department
as 1:2024cv02898
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
Fulton County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv02906
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
The Mark Atlanta Georgia and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. United States Government
as 1:2024cv02909
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv02892
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
