Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Poole v. Smith et al
as 7:2026cv01405
Plaintiff: Terry Poole
Defendant: Smith, Clemons, Jason Fish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv03350
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
USA v. Jarvis Pool
as 26-3713
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JARVIS G. POOL
Saucedo, et al. v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 26-5006
Plaintiff: SERGIO SAUCEDO, PATRICK POOL, JAIME PEREZ and others
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Michael Reed, et alIn re: Michael Reed, et al
as 26-504
Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL B. REED, Individually/Deceased, Constance M. Reed on behalf of C.R. on behalf of L.R., JAMES L. ENGLAND, JR., BRITTANY N. HYRE ANCULLE and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Pool vs Rick Hill, et al
as 4:2026cv06223
Plaintiff: Mark Jerome Pool
Defendant: Rick Hill, Jarvis Parson and Individually John Brick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-12713
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael Reed, et al v. USA
as 26-5676
Plaintiff: MICHAEL B. REED, Individually/Deceased, Constance M. Reed on behalf of C.R. on behalf of L.R., JAMES L. ENGLAND, JR., BRITTANY N. HYRE ANCULLE and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Pool v. State of Texas et al
as 4:2026cv06220
Petitioner: Mark Jerome Pool
Respondent: State Of Texas, Brazos County Texas and Jarvis Parsons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SAFESPILL SYSTEMS LLC v. POOLE FIRE PROTECTION INC et al
as 2:2026cv00392
Plaintiff: SAFESPILL SYSTEMS LLC
Defendant: POOLE FIRE PROTECTION INC, PE JOHN W POOLE, III, NICHOLAS BRONDUM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?