Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Jerome Hulsey v. Pruitts Nursing Facility
as 26-12560
Plaintiff:
JEROME HULSEY
Defendant:
PRUITTS NURSING FACILITY
Johnson v. City of Montgomery, Alabama et al
as 2:2026cv00579
Plaintiff:
Marche' Johnson
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Alabama, The Montgomery City Council, Ed Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pruitt v. McDade et al
as 1:2026cv01213
Plaintiff:
Leslie Sean Pruitt
Defendant:
David McDade, Detective Kenneth Storey, Jonathan Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pruitt v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2026cv01281
Plaintiff:
Luke Adam Pruitt
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Pruitt v. Shoebacca Ltd.
as 2:2026cv06566
Plaintiff:
Christine Pruitt
Defendant:
Shoebacca Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Heather Nicole Pruitt v. Frank Bisignano
as 5:2026cv03187
Plaintiff:
Heather Nicole Pruitt
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Christine Pruitt v. Goodstuff Juices LLC
as 2:2026cv05756
Plaintiff:
Christine Pruitt
Defendant:
Goodstuff Juices LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Christine Pruitt v. Kirby Beauty LLC
as 2:2026cv05379
Plaintiff:
Christine Pruitt
Defendant:
Kirby Beauty LLC doing business as Cecred
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Wilson v. Evans et al
as 3:2026cv00327
Plaintiff:
Dr. Jennifer Wilson
Defendant:
Lance Evans, Wendi Barrett, Mary Werner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
