Cases 21 - 30 of 61
PUTT v BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC et al
as 3:2019cv03696
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KEITH PUTT
Defendant:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC and BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arthur Putt et al v. CBS Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv06909
Plaintiff:
Arthur Putt and Janet Putt
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Forest River, Inc., Does 1-850 inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lynch Sales Company v. Webb et al
as 1:2019cv00537
Defendant:
Daniel Webb, R.M. Putt, Inc. and Robert Putt
Plaintiff:
Lynch Sales Company
Not Classified By Court:
Facilitative Mediator
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Putt v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10039
Plaintiff:
Michael Keith Putt
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Collins v. Putt
as 19-1169
Defendant:
Ed Klonoski, in his official capacity as President of Charter Oak State College and Charter Oak State College
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jeremy Collins
Defendant / Appellee:
Rebecca Putt and Rebecca Putt, in her individual and official capacity
(PC) Reid v. Walker et al
as 1:2018cv01635
Defendant:
Amanda M. Wood, Tameka L. Walker, Scott J. Van De Putte and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russ v. King et al
as 1:2018cv00789
Plaintiff:
Roy Russ
Defendant:
Audrey King, Scott Van de Putte, Cliff Allenby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Putt et al
as 3:2017cv01621
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Collins
Defendant:
Rebecca Putt , Charter Oak State College and Ed Klonoski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PUTT v. QUIGLEY et al
as 5:2016cv01835
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LEE PUTT
Defendant:
JANINE QUIGLEY and MERCADO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd Luh v. Fulton State Hospital, et al
as 15-2895
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Todd James Luh
Defendant - Appellee:
Fulton State Hospital, John Lyskowski, Doctor, John Brown, Nurse and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
