Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Benge v. Kroger et al
as 2:2015cv00751
Petitioner:
John Sherman Benge
Respondent:
Kate Brown, Alaxander R. Gardner and John Kroger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Stevens et al
as 2:2015cv00107
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Rogers
Defendant:
Robert Stevens, R Gardner, P Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Stevens et al
as 5:2015cv00108
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Rogers
Defendant:
Robert Stevens, R Gardner, P Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seibert v. Clifftop Alliance et al
as 3:2015cv00296
Plaintiff:
Greg Seibert
Defendant:
Clifftop Alliance , Carl Daubach , Penelope Daubach and others
Counter_claimant:
James M Hill , Clifftop Alliance , Steve Gonzalez and others
Counter_defendant:
Greg Seibert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Stevens et al
as 5:2015cv00068
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Rogers
Defendant:
Robert Stevens, R Gardner, P Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOLISH v. MCLEAN et al
as 1:2014cv02084
Defendant:
H. CRAWFORD, M. DAULTON, R. GARDNER and others
Plaintiff:
CAMERON GOLISH
Miscellaneou:
WESTVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02062
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Gardner
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gardner v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv26602
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Gardner
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gardner et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv12755
Plaintiff:
Wanda R. Gardner and Ray Gardner
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
