Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Mathews v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv03415
Plaintiff:
Eric Mathews
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Patterson v. Warden, Pinellas County Jail (Pinellas)
as 8:2026cv02681
Petitioner:
Mathew Patterson
Respondent:
Warden, Pinellas County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
CARROLL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2026cv03204
Plaintiff:
RASHEED ANDREW CARROLL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE and MATHEW NEALON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
HALL v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 3:2026cv01819
Plaintiff:
H. MATHEW HALL
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Mihalus v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv03168
Plaintiff:
Mathew Mihalus
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv11622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03335
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mathews v. Federal Express Corporation
as 4:2026cv04213
Plaintiff:
Jason Mathews
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
