Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Donald Rouse v. Dana Nessel
as 23-1738
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD ROUSE
Defendant / Appellee:
DANA NESSEL, in her official and individual and personal capacity as the Attorney General for the State of Michigan, R. PAUL VIAR, in his official and individual and personal capacity as the Assistant Attorney General for the State of Michigan and DENNIS JAMES, in his official and individual and personal capacity as the Special Agent for the Attorney General's Office
Sibley v. Continental Land and Fur et al
as 3:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Brandon Sibley
Defendant:
Continental Land and Fur, Dewayne Crawford, R Paul Loveless and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JP MORGAN MORTGAGE ACQUISITION CORPORATION v. PAUL et al
as 1:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
JP MORGAN MORTGAGE ACQUISITION CORPORATION
Defendant:
JAMES A PAUL, JR and KIMBERLY R PAUL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rouse v. Nessel et al
as 8:2022cv03800
Plaintiff:
Donald Rouse
Defendant:
Dana Nessel, R Paul Viar and Dennis James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Wilbert Glover v. Richard Rodriquez, et al
as 22-2640
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Wilbert Glover
Defendant:
Richard Rodriquez, Alberts Ross, Matt Bostrom and others
Defendant / Appellant:
R. Paul, #705
Paul v. Brown et al
as 1:2021cv00561
Petitioner:
Melvin R. Paul
Respondent:
A. W. Brown and William Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Christopher Atwood, et al v. UC Health, et al
as 21-3738
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT ATWOOD, REBEKAH BRADY, JENNIFER HICKEY and others
Defendant:
UC HEALTH, et al.
Defendant / Appellant:
ABUBAKAR ATIQ DURRANI, MD and CENTER FOR ADVANCED SPINE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Rouse v. Nessel et al
as 2:2021cv11626
Plaintiff:
Donald Rouse
Defendant:
Dana Nessel, R. Paul Viar and Dennis James
US v. Gianelli
as 21-1302
Interested Party:
YOUSEF BINA and COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
ARTHUR GIANELLI
Claimant:
R. PAUL DUBE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
