Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Whitt v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2026cv04558
Plaintiff:
Kenya Whitt
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ridha et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv04524
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Raheem Ridha, Davin Tikkanen, Ernesto Garcia and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 4:2026cv03780
Plaintiff:
Vonnie Jones, Jr, Kyle Tippins, Lauren Atherton and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Burgess v. Dotson et al
as 7:2026cv00368
Plaintiff:
Earl Dushawn Burgess
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, Joseph Walters, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Artis v. Simmons et al
as 2:2026cv01186
Plaintiff:
Xavier Lavell Artis
Defendant:
Lieutenant J. Simmons and Officer Whitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Artis v. Simmons et al
as 1:2026cv22570
Plaintiff:
Xavier Lavell Artis
Defendant:
Lt. J. Simmons and Officer Whitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Karsten Allen v. Officer B. Sater
as 26-6385
Plaintiff:
KARSTEN OBED ALLEN
Defendant:
OFFICER B. SATER, SERGEANT E. J. DALES, OFFICER B. VIARS and others
David Meyers v. Ewing
as 26-6324
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
EWING, Sergeant, Wallens Ridge State Prison Hearing Officer, OFFICER NELSON, CHRISTOPHER KING and others
David Meyers v. Michael Pozeg
as 26-6326
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MICHAEL POZEG, WRSP Cheif of Housing and Programs, DAVID ROSE, The WRSP-A.D.A- Coordinator and Operations Manager, DAVID ZOOK, WRSP Chief Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
