Cases 21 - 30 of 5,251
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Randolph County Equine and Agricultural Association, Inc. et al v. United States Department of Agriculture - Rural Development et al
as 3:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Randolph County Equine and Agricultural Association, Inc. and Stephanie Herren
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture - Rural Development and Allen Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
TEAGUE v. MITCHELL et al
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
THOMAS T. TEAGUE, SR.
Defendant:
DANNY MITCHELL, DIANE PHEIFFER, I. RANDOLPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Blehco 520, LLC et al v. The Timber Ridge Group, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Blehco 520, LLC, William Randolph Stinson, II and Ram Linga Reddy Dornala
Defendant:
The Timber Ridge Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Randolph et al v. Myers Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
Jasonn Randolph, Melanie Randolph, Randolph Kenneth and others
Defendant:
Myers Industries, Inc., Scepter Corporation, Scepter Manufacturing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Randolph Johnson v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6280
Petitioner:
RANDOLPH WAKEEM JOHNSON
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dalley v. Randolph Brooks Federal Credit Union
as 1:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Robert Dalley
Defendant:
Randolph Brooks Federal Credit Union
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
