Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Nicholas Smith, Jr. v. Timothy Webster, et al
as 25-13903
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS SAMMIE LEE SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
TIMOTHY WEBSTER, SHERLOCK STERLING, COREY CHAPLIN and others
SMITH v. WEBSTER et al
as 3:2025cv00824
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS SAMMIE LEE SMITH, JR
Defendant:
TIMOTHY WEBSTER, SHERLOCK STERLING, COREY CHAPLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv04764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hicks v. Emberton et al
as 4:2020cv00372
Plaintiff:
Charles Hicks
Defendant:
Roger Payne, Bonnie Wheeler, Steven Love and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlo et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11144
Plaintiff:
Joseph Quinones, Dennis Dawid, Gary Luciani and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Abrams, et al. v. Nucor Steel Marion, Inc.
as 3:2015cv02342
Plaintiff:
Michael F Abrams, Jordan Freeman, Joe Cornelius and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Chatman v. Maggio et al
as 4:2015cv00381
Plaintiff:
Rolandis Chatman
Defendant:
Michael Maggio, Troy Braswell, Charles Finkenbinder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thacker v. Diamond Offshore Drilling Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01642
Plaintiff:
Robert Thacker
Defendant:
Diamond Offshore Drilling Services, Inc. and Diamond Offshore Services, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688 Marine Personal Injury
Penny Trent v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2012cv02221
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino, Does, Angelo Gibilterra and others
Plaintiff:
Penny Trent
THACKER v. PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS et al
as 3:2008cv03421
Plaintiff:
ROBERT THACKER
Defendant:
PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS and INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS-LOCAL UNION 94
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
