Cases 1 - 10 of 11
NELSON v. ERIE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
as 1:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARY NELSON
Defendant:
ERIE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022mc00025
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06576
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv02535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
NELSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv07473
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARIE NELSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Isbell v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2018cv02705
Defendant:
Rosemary Nelson, Ramon Gomez, Declan M McCarthy and others
Plaintiff:
William Mark Isbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isbell v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2018cv00290
Plaintiff:
William Mark Isbell
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Jody Bodway, Andrea Perez-Santillan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Ball Health Care-Monroe, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00600
Defendant:
Ball Health Care-Monroe, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rosemarie Nelson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Thomas Hightower v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 09-80182
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
THOMAS A. HIGHTOWER
Defendant - Respondent:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, EDWARD S. ALEMEDIA, N. GRANNIS and others
Hightower v. Schwarzenegger, et al
as 1:2004cv06028
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Hightower
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger , Edward S Alemedia , N. Grannis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
