Cases 1 - 10 of 1,137
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv20209
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Moore v. Bailey et al
as 2:2025cv00003
Defendant:
Trevor Foley, Rusty Ratliff, Robert Murrell and others
Plaintiff:
James Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ratliff v. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
as 1:2025cv20055
Plaintiff:
DEBBIE RATLIFF
Defendant:
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. doing business as Royal Caribbean Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Anderson v. Greaver et al
as 7:2025cv00003
Defendant:
C.O. Artrip, C.O. Cregger, C.O. Spiva and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda Kay Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ratliff v. STATE OF TEXAS
as 1:2024cv01581
Petitioner:
Kevin Shane Ratliff
Respondent:
STATE OF TEXAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ratliff v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2024cv02757
Defendant:
Louisiana State and Hammond City
Plaintiff:
Kentdrick D Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Ratliff v. Republic National Distributing Company, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv02740
Defendant:
Tyler Hayden and Republic National Distributing Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Emily Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Shelby v. Ratliff et al
as 2:2024cv00086
Defendant:
Mr. Unknown Heath, Aaron Legrande, Unknown Unknown and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shelby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Floyd County, Georgia et al
as 4:2024cv00259
Defendant:
Caleb H. Ratliff, Mark Wallace, Craig Burnes and others
Plaintiff:
Daryl Lee Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burgess v. Ratliff
as 5:2024cv06146
Petitioner:
Michael Lee Burgess
Respondent:
Rusty Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
