Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Turner et al v. Key et al
as 2:2016cv00029
Plaintiff:
Curtis Turner , Mineral Springs School District Board of Education , William Dixon and others
Defendant:
Johnny Key, Arkansas Department of Education, Board of Education of the Arkansas Department of Education and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
HAWKINS v. USA
as 1:2015cv00404
Petitioner:
WILLIE RAY HAWKINS, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hawkins v. Farris et al
as 5:2014cv01395
Petitioner:
Jerry Ray Hawkins
Defendant:
Jim Farris and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAWKINS v. USA
as 1:2012cv00672
Petitioner:
WILLIE RAY HAWKINS, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Donnie Ray Hawkins v. G. Johnson, et al
as 10-4711
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNIE RAY HAWKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
G. R. JOHNSON, Warden and ATTY GEN DE
Hawkins, Jr. v. Apker
as 4:2010cv00450
Petitioner:
Willie Ray Hawkins, Jr.
Respondent:
Craig Apker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HAWKINS et al v. ALFA LAVAL, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv90838
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RAY HAWKINS and BRENDA G. HAWKINS
Defendant:
ALFA LAVAL, INC., AURORA PUMP, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Charles Ray Hawkins, et al. v. Alfa Laval, Inc., et al.
as NCW/1:09-CV-00285
Defendant:
Alfa Laval, Inc
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Hawkins
Hawkins et al v. ALFA LAVAL, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00285
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Hawkins and Brenda G. Hawkins
Defendant:
ALFA LAVAL, INC., Aurora Pump, A. W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2003cv02686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
