Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 31,550
Hatten v. USA
as 2:2024cv00078
Plaintiff: Raymond Hatten
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Bushner v. Kerner et al
as 2:2024cv01861
Plaintiff: Raymond D. Bushner
Defendant: Investigator Eric Kerner, Investigator John/Jane Tabor, Captain John/Jane Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff: Keithen L Jones
Defendant: Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Kauwe v. Nicole Caceres et al
as 8:2024cv00855
Plaintiff: Daniel Kauwe
Defendant: Nicole Caceres, Stacey Berardino, Clayton Chau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raymond Claudio v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 24-11194
Petitioner: RAYMOND CLAUDIO
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Greene v. Pipes et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff: Raymond Shane Greene
Defendant: Wesley S. Pipes, Mary B. Windom, Mark S. Tunstall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. U.S Department of Veterans Affairs
as 1:2024cv11021
Plaintiff: Raymond Wilson
Defendant: U.S Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. v. 2.46 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00483
Plaintiff: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
Defendant: 2.46 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee, Donald L. Mixon, Willadean Ridley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
USA v. Raymond Lee
as 24-11190
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: RAYMOND CHARLES LEE
North Metro Harness Initiative LLC v. Beattie et al
as 0:2024cv01369
Plaintiff: North Metro Harness Initiative LLC doing business as Running Aces
Defendant: Michael Beattie, Craig Beaulieu, Raymond Brenny and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?