Cases 1 - 10 of 25
LOWE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12298
Plaintiff:
PAUL RICHARD LOWE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Transou v. Boyd et al
as 1:2021cv01131
Plaintiff:
Mack T. Transou
Defendant:
Bert C. Boyd, Shuan Brown, Roy B. Morgan, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Pearson et al v. Porch.com Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00697
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Foulger, Holly Garner, Nichole Lynott and others
Defendant:
Darwin Widjaja, Matthew Ehrlichman, Brenton Marrelli and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
LOWE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv58384
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LOWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCARTHY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv33235
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LOWE MCCARTHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CANNON et al v. AUTOMONEY, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00877
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER TAYLOR, JULIA HARRISON, BRIAN BREVARD and others
Defendant:
AUTOMONEY, INC. and AUTOMONEY NORTH, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lowe v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv05570
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Richard Lowe
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
(HC) Lowe v. Douglas County et al
as 1:2018cv01225
Petitioner:
Richard Lowe
Respondent:
Douglas County and Tuolumne County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lowe #215930 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv01140
Plaintiff:
Richard Lowe
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan and Corizon Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
