Cases 1 - 10 of 136
Littleton v. Hudson et al
as 4:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Ricky James Littleton, Jr
Defendant:
Shirley Hudson, K Washington and Whittaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shepard v. Stirling
as 4:2024cv00289
Petitioner:
Ricky James Shepard and Rickey James Shepard
Respondent:
Bryan P. Stirling and Warden Kershaw Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv20797
Plaintiff:
Ricky James
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Bennefield v. USA
as 3:2021cv00309
Petitioner:
Ricky James Bennefield
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ricky Shepard v. Warden of Perry Correctional Institution
as 21-7133
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICKY JAMES SHEPARD, a/k/a Rickey James Shepard
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN OF PERRY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Menard et al v. Allstate Indemnity Co
as 2:2021cv02270
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Plaintiff:
Ricky James Menard and Candice Menard
Defendant:
Allstate Indemnity Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ricky Slater v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 21-11492
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICKY JAMES SLATER
Shepard v. Warden
as 4:2021cv00818
Petitioner:
Ricky James Shepard and Rickey James Shepard
Respondent:
Bryan P. Stirling and Warden, Perry Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
