Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02976
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Horne v. Pennock et al
as 4:2016cv04271
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Horne
Defendant:
Wanda Pennock, Bryant Mayes, Amy Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00895
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wood v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01890
Plaintiff:
Rodney Wood
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wood v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00350
Plaintiff:
Rodney Wood
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOOD v. NELSEN et al
as 3:2014cv05016
Petitioner:
RODNEY WOOD
Respondent:
KENNETH NELSEN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson et al v. Usey
as 2:2014cv00595
Plaintiff:
Cardella Wilson , Carnetta Wilson , Anitra Woods and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2679
Bryant et al v. City of Ripley, Mississippi et al
as 3:2012cv00037
Plaintiff:
Corey Bryant , Charles Bryant and Shari Bryant
Defendant:
City of Ripley, Mississippi, South Tippah School District, Ripley Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Maxwell v. Rick Toney, et al
as 09-2868
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Maxwell
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Diagnostic Unit, Varner Unit and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Rick Toney, Warden, Diagnostic Unit, ADC, Bobby Hamilton, Sgt., Diagnostic Unit, ADC, Sean Campbell, CO-II, Diagnostic Unit, ADC and others
Rodney Woods
as 2:2009cr20221
Defendant:
Rodney Woods
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America, United States of America and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
