Cases 1 - 10 of 210
Tolston v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Tolston
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Albert Anderson v. Reep
as 24-6339
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
REEP, Warden, DOUG NEWTON, Warden, FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Prison and others
Wade v. State of South Carolina et al
as 4:2024cv01686
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Wade
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, Department of Mental Health, Kelly Gothard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Williams v. Floyde et al
as 5:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Williams
Defendant:
Elizabeth Floyde, Joseph Crosswhite, Sam Winthrop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crockett v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv01514
Petitioner:
Roy Lee Crockett, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Dykes v. USA
as 2:2023cv81539
Petitioner:
Roy Lee Dykes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Anderson v. State Of Ohio
as 2:2023cv03201
Petitioner:
Roy Lee Anderson, Jr.
Respondent:
State Of Ohio and Warden Lebanon Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roy Lee Walker v. People of The State of California
as 5:2023cv01400
Petitioner:
Roy Lee Walker
Respondent:
People of The State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Smith et al
as 5:2023cv01814
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Brown
Defendant:
Officer K. Smith and Officer Alexander Oviedo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trogdon v. DeGuehery et al
as 5:2023ct03065
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Trogdon
Defendant:
Dr. Limdsey E. DeGuehery, Warden Stephen Waddell and Sheila Sauls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
