Cases 1 - 10 of 2,793
Patterson v. Orange County et al
as 7:2024cv03554
Plaintiff:
Franeisha Patterson
Defendant:
Orange County, ORANGE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Doe, et al v. City of Boston, et al
as 24-1419
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and JAMES DOE
Defendant:
BOSTON, MA, PAUL EVANS, individually, ROBERT DUNFORD, individually and others
Coriolan v. BIH Express Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Rudolphe Coriolan
Defendant:
BIH Express Inc, Trans-Porte Inc and Keanna Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
United States, et al v. Rudolph, et al
as 24-1177
Plaintiff:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
JULIAN RUDOLPH and ANABIANCA RUDOLPH
Defendant:
LORI MILLIRON and LAWRENCE RUDOLPH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Phillips v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv02265
Plaintiff:
Herman Phillips
Defendant:
Governor William Lee, David Rausch, Frank Strada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Porter #341649 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00916
Petitioner:
Rudolph John Porter, Jr.
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
