Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Ray v. Sowell et al
as 4:2026cv00903
Defendant:
Eddie, Sowell, Knight and others
Plaintiff:
Daran Lee Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2026cv01759
Plaintiff:
Thomas N. Hawkins
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Ms. Caples and Amber Sundquist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albert Mills v. Jeff Nines
as 26-6887
Plaintiff:
ALBERT CURTIS MILLS
Defendant:
JEFF NINES, Warden, BETHANY CORNACHIA, Assistant Warden, RONALD STOTLER, Chief of Security and others
Adams v. Borer et al
as 3:2026cv01312
Plaintiff:
Alfreda Adams
Defendant:
Dorinda Borer, Nancy Rossi, Kevin Casini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GREEN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2026cv02825
Plaintiff:
CAPLE GREEN
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Rhonda Baskerville and Malik Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hutchinson v. Cornachia et al
as 1:2026cv03028
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hutchinson
Defendant:
Bethany Cornachia, Tichnell, Sgt. T. Bohrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01984
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Caple v. Warden, FCC Coleman II (Sumter)
as 5:2026cv00316
Petitioner:
Daniel Glenn Caple
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Henderson Generational Holdings, LLC v. Torrey
as 4:2026cv00468
Defendant:
Gene Torrey
Plaintiff:
Henderson Generational Holdings, LLC doing business as Caple Shaw Industries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
