Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Love v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SEPTA) et al
as 2:2026cv07214
Plaintiff:
Zachary Collin Love
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SEPTA) and JOHN DOE DESIGNATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Polk v. Lacy et al
as 2:2026cv00148
Plaintiff:
Brandon Chrishon Polk
Defendant:
D Lacy, K Batchelor, A Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02582
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Collins v. City of Broxton, Georgia et al
as 5:2026cv01008
Plaintiff:
Princess Collins
Defendant:
City of Broxton, Georgia and Hunter Harrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02573
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02572
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Murry v. Watkins et al
as 4:2026cv00948
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Darnell Murry, Jr
Defendant:
Chris Watkins, Robert Doyal, Hunter Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuel Wendt v. Jamie Bullard
as 26-6985
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL CLEMENT WENDT
Defendant:
JAMIE BULLARD, SHAWNA BROWN, GLENDA JACKSON and others
Podesta v. Collins
as 26-2270
Claimant:
ALBERTO M. PODESTA
Respondent:
DOUGLAS A. COLLINS, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Collins v. Warden, Telford Unit et al
as 5:2026cv00139
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Collins
Defendant:
Warden, Telford Unit, Ranking Officers of the Telford Unit, Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
