Cases 1 - 10 of 107
Stewart v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Julius Stewart
Defendant:
SA Johnson and Milwaukee County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Decker v. Lilita Infante, et al
as 24-1077
Plaintiff:
ROBERT K. DECKER
Defendant:
LILITA INFANTE, D.E.A. Special Agent, JASON HAYES, T.F.O., aka Jason Heyes, RAPHAEL GARCIA, U.S.P.I.S. Inspector and others
Ford v. Stone et al
as 5:2024ct03001
Plaintiff:
Jarred J. Ford
Defendant:
Keith Stone, Sheriff Bond Surety, Major Allen Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphreys v. Securus Phone et al
as 4:2023cv05171
Plaintiff:
Scott W Humphreys
Defendant:
Securus Phone, More, A More and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphreys v. Securus Phone et al
as 3:2023cv06120
Plaintiff:
Scott Wesley Humphreys
Defendant:
Securus Phone, More, A More and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jiggetts v. Shellenberger
as 1:2023cv02616
Plaintiff:
Alexander Jiggetts
Defendant:
SA Scott Shellenberger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruce Partridge v. State of Minn. Beltrami County, et al
as 23-2092
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bruce Partridge
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Minnesota Beltrami County, Beltrami County, City of Bemidji and others
Thornton v. FBOP Director et al
as 2:2023cv02237
Plaintiff:
Lucas O. Thornton
Defendant:
FBOP Director, Warden Bowers, F/N/U Childress and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ruhren v. Dept of Justice et al
as 1:2023cv00495
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ruhren
Defendant:
Dept of Justice, SA Shane D. Dana, SA Preston Bosch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Lawson v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Lawson
Defendant:
Pima, County of, Pima County Sheriff's Department, Chris Nanos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
