Cases 31 - 40 of 24,274
Ahkeem Scott-Manna v. Mark Sevier
as 24-1667
Petitioner:
AKHEEM S. SCOTT-MANNA
Respondent:
MARK R. SEVIER, Warden
Sutton v. Wriggelsworth et al
as 1:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Roy Eugene Sutton, III
Defendant:
Scott Wriggelsworth, Unknown Party and Glen Cipullo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massey v. State of Missouri et al
as 6:2024cv03121
Plaintiff:
Jesse Leonard Massey
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Springfield Police Department and multiple unknown officers, City of Springfield, Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRIESTER v. HARRIS et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
DAVID PRIESTER, JAMES THOMAS and DAVID JACKSON
Defendant:
SCOTT S HARRIS, GRANT MALOY, EUGENE GRINBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calisi v. COUNTY OF VOLUSIA et al
as 6:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
Dillon James Calisi
Defendant:
COUNTY OF VOLUSIA and SCOTT D'ESPOSITO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Adams v. Jackson et al
as 4:2024cv05041
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scott Adams and Rooster
Defendant:
Robert Jackson, Ronald Haynes, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grubb v. Crews et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Joshua A. Grubb
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Scott Jordan, Laura Plappert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Parkins v. Deigarion Staten, et al
as 24-1814
Plaintiff:
Michael Justin Parkins
Defendant:
Deigarion M. Staten, Corporal, East Arkansas Regional Unit, Scott Taylor, Major, East Arkansas Regional Unit, Watson, Lt., East Arkansas Regional Unit and others
Robinson v. Jackson et al
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Wallace Tremayne Robinson, Sr
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, Brandon Davis, M Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
