Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv02382
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Camacho v. Association of Apartment Owners of Ke Nani Kai, et al.
as 26-6968
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CAMACHO
Defendant:
ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF KE NANI KAI, ASSOCIATIONS, INC., DBA Associa Hawaii, JOHN SEARS and others
Marquette Sears v. American Express Company, et al
as 26-13844
Plaintiff:
MARQUETTE LASHAWN DEVONTE SEARS
Defendant:
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY and NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Foreman v. Sears et al
as 3:2026cv06276
Plaintiff:
Ira Foreman
Defendant:
Sears, Jason Butz, Curtis J Broten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01207
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Stanley v. West Reentry Treatment et al
as 3:2026cv11242
Plaintiff:
Rodric Petrece Stanley
Defendant:
West Reentry Treatment, Contra Costa County Sheriff's Classification Unit, L.T. Sears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sears v. Guerrero
as 1:2026cv02762
Petitioner:
Damian Sears
Respondent:
Eric Guerrero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SEARS et al v. ULTA SALON, COSMETICS & FRAGRANCE, INC.
as 1:2026cv02026
Plaintiff:
ABRIEL SEARS and FAITH TAYLOR
Defendant:
ULTA SALON, COSMETICS & FRAGRANCE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Strobel v. United States, et al
as 26-3198
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ROBERT STROBEL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (FNU) HUDSON, (FNU) CARTER and others
Eidson v. Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government et al
as 3:2026cv00708
Plaintiff:
Robert Eidson
Defendant:
Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, Adam Sears, Paul Humphrey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
