Cases 11 - 20 of 121
Brown v. Swenson
as 0:2023cv01390
Plaintiff:
Shawn Brown
Defendant:
Brittney Swenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Staley v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2022cv02028
Plaintiff:
David James Staley
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Rob Jeffreys, Jeffrey M. Dennison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Brown v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv04494
Plaintiff:
Michael Shawn Brown
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Manisha Penesa v. Shawn Brown, et al
as 22-55591
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANISHA L. PENESA
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAWN BROWN, Peace-Officer, in individual capacity and REBECCA REYES, individual and official capacity
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTION FOR WOMEN, JAMES A. BROWN III, in individual capacity, K. HUGHES, Warden, in individual and official capacity and others
USA v. Shawn Brown
as 22-2046
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SHAWN BROWN, a/k/a Kenneth Jenkins
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Brown v. Windham
as 4:2022cv04039
Plaintiff:
Brion Day Shawn Brown
Defendant:
Nevada County Jail, Andrew Windham, Debra Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
