Cases 1 - 10 of 1,542
Shelton v. Watwood et al
as 1:2024cv01097
Plaintiff:
James Michael Shelton
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Frank Strada, Danny H. Goodman, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abercrumble v. Bass et al
as 3:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Shelton Abercrumble
Defendant:
Warden Bass, Lt Smith and CO Scout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Prisoner Review Board et al
as 1:2024cv03027
Plaintiff:
James KA Thomas
Defendant:
Prisoner Review Board, Jared Bohland, Kenneth Tupy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Wellpath et al
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Shelton R. Thomas
Defendant:
Wellpath, Jermaine White, Ricky Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Russ et al
as 5:2024ct03085
Plaintiff:
Andre C. Shelton
Defendant:
Nicholas A. Russ, Dare County Detention Center, Marshall H. Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taper v. Tabor et al
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Joshua Taper
Defendant:
Jon Tabor, Tammy Shelton, Amber Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SHELTON v. PA. BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE et al
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
NORMAN SHELTON
Defendant:
PA. BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, SUPERINTENDANT MS. THOMSON and TONY SPREARS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Inmate Trust Fund
as 6:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
David L. Shelton
Defendant:
Inmate Trust Fund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dwight Shelton v. Bryan Birkholz
as 2:2024cv01249
Petitioner:
Dwight Shelton
Respondent:
Bryan Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Norman Shelton v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, et al
as 24-1203
Plaintiff:
NORMAN SHELTON
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
