Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Jones v. Clark et al
as 8:2014cv02581
Plaintiff:
James Edward Jones
Defendant:
Steven Clark, T. Sheffield and T. Bowden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall et al v. ESPN Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01945
Plaintiff:
Javon Marshall , Steven Clarke , Chris Conner and others
Defendant:
ESPN Inc. , CBS Broadcasting, Inc. , National Broadcasting Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kelly Koerner v. James Cox, et al
as 14-15159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELLY KOERNER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES GREG COX, PAMELA DELPORTO, Inspector General and STEVEN CLARK, Disciplinary Hearing Officer
Clark v. Colvin
as 6:2013cv06628
Plaintiff:
Allan Steven Clark
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Thompson et al v. County of Fairfax, VA
as 1:2013cv01362
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thompson , Elton Polen, Jr. , David Conrad and others
Defendant:
County of Fairfax, VA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark v. Royal et al
as 5:2013cv00087
Plaintiff:
Steven Clark
Defendant:
Randy Royal and Stapleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv08229
Plaintiff:
Lisa Clark and Steven Clark
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Approximately $49,900.00 in U.S. Currency
as 2:2012cv02878
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $49,900.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Steven Clark Cripe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv03267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Clark v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv00173
Plaintiff:
Steven Clark
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
