Cases 31 - 40 of 279
McCartney v. Curl et al
as 4:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Rick L McCartney
Defendant:
Chase Curl, Zack Sebree, Aaron Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emmitt v. Cain et al
as 3:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Roscoe George Emmitt, Jr.
Defendant:
Burl Cain, John Doe #1, M. Johnson and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Moore et al
as 4:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
Tony L Franklin
Defendant:
Rocky N Moore, Krystal Simmons and Justin C Sand-Wable
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sands v. Hill
as 1:2021cv02399
Petitioner:
Joseph A. Sands
Respondent:
Warden Leon Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henderson v. Mercer et al
as 3:2021cv00620
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Donald Bryant, Timothy Hardrick and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pennington v City of Sand Springs
as 4:2021cv00245
Petitioner:
Christopher Ronald Pennington
Respondent:
City of Sand Springs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
White v. Beard et al
as 0:2021cv00049
Defendant:
T. Nicely, K. Boyles, J. Noble and others
Plaintiff:
John David White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HENDERSON v. MERCER et al
as 7:2021cv00053
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, DONALD BRYANT, JUDGE W LOUIS SANDS and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sands v. State of Oregon, et al,.
as 2:2021cv00631
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Mike Gower, Colette Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sands
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VEGA RODRIGUEZ v. FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00203
Defendant:
MR. CLARKE, FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, MR. HOOD and others
Plaintiff:
JOAQUIN VEGA RODRIGUEZ, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
