Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Murphy et al v. Sargent et al
as 7:2026cv00739
Defendant:
Nancy Comb Dickenson, Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent, Jennifer Rebecca Bockhorst and others
Plaintiff:
Damian Antonio Murphy and President Donald J. Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bellamy v. Horry County et al
as 5:2026cv04032
Plaintiff:
Jarreit Bellamy
Defendant:
Horry County, Horry County Chief of Police, Unknown Sargent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Henry v. Davis et al.
as 4:2026cv02216
Plaintiff:
Markus Quantez Henry
Defendant:
Warden Anthony Davis, Melissa Spatney, Unit Sargent Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SARGENT v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2026vv01346
Petitioner:
DEEMA SARGENT
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Jenkins v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
as 26-5927
Plaintiff:
Sargent DEBRA LYNN JENKINS, SN39547
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a Municipal Entity and Employer Los Angeles Police, JAMES FRONTIER, Lt. GILLAN, SN 35215 and others
Sargent v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv03252
Plaintiff:
Zachary Sargent
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Sargent v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026at01679
Plaintiff:
Zachary Sargent
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Contreras v. Brantley et al
as 2:2026cv00285
Plaintiff:
Luis Arturo Jaimes Contreras
Defendant:
Deputy Charles F. Brantley, III, Lieutenant Mitchell Salain and Lieutenant Kiley M. Sargent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2026cv03455
Plaintiff:
David Turner
Defendant:
Charles Jenkins, Att'y Garl Todd Blanche, Paul D. Hazelhurst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.