Cases 61 - 70 of 560
Michael et al v. Muskegon, County of et al
as 1:2022cv00147
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Muskegon, County of, Michael Poulin and others
Plaintiff:
Gracie Michael
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Aphex BioCleanse Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10219
Plaintiff:
Scott Smith
Defendant:
Aphex BioCleanse Systems, Inc. and Charles Ragland
Not Classified By Court:
David Olund
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Jonathan Aceves et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2022cv00636
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Aceves, Crystal Aceves and Evelyn Aceves
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Scott Smith and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chelmsford Group, LLC, et al v. Smith
as 21-1996
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHELMSFORD GROUP, LLC and NEWBURY MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT SMITH
Smith v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 1:2021cv00294
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Smith
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America and Unum Group
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Smith v. Sinclair
as 3:2021cv05801
Petitioner:
William Scott Smith
Respondent:
Steven Sinclair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv47788
Plaintiff:
SCOTT SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv01422
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv36482
Plaintiff:
SCOTT SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(SS) Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv01160
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Scott Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
