Cases 1 - 10 of 13,089
Hill v. Illinois Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2024cv04176
Plaintiff:
Tonetta Hill
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Human Services, Colleen Delaney, Sherri Baumley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Glenn et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 3:2024cv03028
Plaintiff:
Ashley Glenn, Terrie Hood, Kylie Sorge and others
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc.
Blake v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Sherry Lynn Blake
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Launza et al v. Pennsylvania Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 3:2024cv00701
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Launza and Sherry Launza
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Company and Michael Todd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Tenney v. Edger et al
as 1:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
Sherry Tenney
Defendant:
Paul Edger, Mia Paone, Sarah Frasch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Paige v. Marshall et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Petitioner:
Brianna Nicole Paige, Brianna Ann Sunshine and William Allen LaRue
Respondent:
William Marshall, Shelby O. Searls, Sherry Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herbert v. Espinal et al
as 1:2024cv03604
Plaintiff:
Sherry D. Herbert and Melvon E. Herbert
Defendant:
Christoph Espinal and ARS CARGO LOGISTIC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
BAKER v. ASHONG et al
as 1:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
LINDSEY DIANE BAKER
Defendant:
HELENA ASHONG, HOPE DE KREF, KATHY NICHOLAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glassel v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Glassel
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Raccio and Sherri Fritter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bates v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01782
Plaintiff:
Sherry Bates
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
