Cases 1 - 10 of 855
Spike Enterprise, Inc. v. NLRB
as 24-1085
Petitioner:
Spike Enterprise, Inc.
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
United States of America v. King
as 24-975
Defendant:
DARNELL KING and Spike
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Spikes v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Quiwaneca Spikes
Defendant:
State of Nevada and Administrative
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Spikes v. CCDC et al
as 2:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Quiwaneca Spikes
Defendant:
CCDC and Overbay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. GJELI et al
as 2:2024cv00881
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
LUAN GJELI, TIERA D. GORDON, TAUSHA D. MCDANIEL Individually, and as officers, directors, shareholders and/or principals of TD 7016 FRANKFORD INC d/b/a SPIKED LOUNGE and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
Givens v. Willington et al
as 9:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
Wesley L. Givens
Defendant:
Willington, A/W People, Frank Ocean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Larmore et al
as 0:2024mc00010
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Jonathan Larmore, ArciTerra Companies, LLC, ArciTerra Note Advisors II, LLC and others
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. LARMORE et al
as 1:2023mc00144
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
JONATHAN LARMORE, ARCITERRA COMPANIES LLC, ARCITERRA NOTE ADVISORS II, LLC and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Larmore et al
as 3:2024ms00004
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Jonathan Larmore, ArciTerra Companies, LLC, ArciTerra Note Advisors II, LLC and others
Receiver:
Allen D. Applbaum
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
