Cases 1 - 10 of 15
SHIPPS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv73137
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN ARNOLD SHIPPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARNOLD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv27075
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN ARNOLD
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crook v. Thrice et al
as 4:2017cv00327
Plaintiff:
Stephen Arnold Crook
Defendant:
Thrice, Roy Griffin, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Office Depot, Inc. et al v. Arnold
as 1:2017mc91040
Plaintiff:
Office Depot, Inc. and Officemax Incorporated
Defendant:
Stephen Arnold
Respondent:
W.B. Mason Co., Inc.
Office Depot, Inc. et al v. Arnold
as 9:2016cv81650
Plaintiff:
Office Depot, Inc. and Officemax Incorporated
Defendant:
Stephen Arnold
Counter_claimant:
Stephen Arnold
Counter_defendant:
Office Depot, Inc. and Officemax Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bledsoe v. McDowel et al
as 4:2016cv04057
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Bledsoe
Defendant:
Bobbie McDowel and Stephen Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Stephen Arnold Group LLC v. Warner/Chappell Music Inc
as 3:2015cv02123
Plaintiff:
The Stephen Arnold Group LLC
Defendant:
Warner/Chappell Music Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Arnold v. UNUM Life Insurance Company et al
as 4:2015cv01170
Plaintiff:
Stephen Arnold
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company and Chiron Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Randle v. Gretna City et al
as 2:2012cv01567
Plaintiff:
Antonio Randle
Defendant:
Gretna City, Gretna Police Department, Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00804
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
