Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Sweatman v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv01573
Plaintiff:
Mindy Sweatman
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sweatman v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv01574
Plaintiff:
Trenton Sweatman
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sweatman v. Progressive Insurance Company
as 2:2026cv00658
Plaintiff:
Chad Sweatman
Defendant:
Progressive Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
SWEATMAN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv02096
Petitioner:
SUEANN SWEATMAN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Sweatman v. Allen et al
as 1:2025cv05940
Plaintiff:
Joseph Z. Sweatman
Defendant:
Levon Allen, Sergeant Fullerton, Sergeant Flippen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
SWEATMAN, JR. v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2025cv01556
Plaintiff:
JAMES SWEATMAN, JR.
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jarell Terry v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 25-1374
Plaintiff:
Jarell Davis Terry
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Director, ADC, William F. Straughn, Deputy Director, ADC, Gaylon Lay, Retired Warden, ADC and others
Harris v. Merrit Health Corporation et al
as 1:2025cv00022
Plaintiff:
Oris Harris
Defendant:
Merrit Health Corporation, Steven Roth and Sweatman Security
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. Gordelis
as 25-52
Defendant:
MCCRAY, BRANDON BROMLEY, GORDELIS and others
Plaintiff:
DEAVEN TUCKER
Sweatman v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65274
Plaintiff:
Randall Sweatman
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
