Cases 1 - 10 of 640
Jones v. USA
as 3:2024cv01207
Petitioner:
Dashay T. Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
(PC) Young v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv01869
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, M. Leavens, R. Hibbard and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Powell Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. Bobby Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv02545
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Matthew T. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. ODOM
as 1:2024cv00099
Petitioner:
EMORY T. JONES
Respondent:
WARDEN ROY ODUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Odum
as 4:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
Emory T. Jones
Respondent:
Roy Odum
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. Fender et al
as 2:2024cv01185
Plaintiff:
Michael Brooks
Defendant:
Stephen Fender, Steven B. Wolfson, Kathleen Delaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Acacia T. Jones
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jones v. AAM Equipment LLC
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
James T. Jones
Defendant:
AAM Equipment LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 in Personal Injury
Jones et al v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Randy T Jones, Wanda E Jones and Wanda Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Construction Industry Laborers Pension Fund et al v. Coffel Construction, LLC
as 4:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Construction Industry Laborers Pension Fund, Construction Industry Laborers Welfare Fund, Greater Kansas City Laborers Vacation Plan and others
Defendant:
Coffel Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
