Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Wright v. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 4:2019cv00392
Defendant:
Tamia Simmon, Lawances Jackson, Does 1-2, Shuttle Driver and V.A. Counselor and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Charles Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emily Robb, et al v. Lock Haven University
as 19-8017
Not Yet Classified:
JACQUELYN BINGHAM, KAYLA BRATHWAITE, TAYLOR PLOUSE and others
Plaintiff:
KELLY GERRITY
Tamia Privette, Personal Representative For The Estate Of Catherine Macon v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC f/k/a JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC et al
as 2:2019cv08772
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer HealthCare LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Tamia Privette, Personal Representative For The Estate Of Catherine Macon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gaston et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12338
Plaintiff:
Christian Blom, Andrew Canonico, Tamia Howard and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Jones v. Cook County Jail
as 1:2018cv08423
Defendant:
Cook County Jail
Plaintiff:
Jazmine Tamia Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Atlanta Center for Self Sufficiency, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv04260
Defendant:
Tamia Hill, DeKalb County, City of Brookhaven and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Cotter Corporation et al
as 4:2018cv00624
Plaintiff:
Tamia Banks
Defendant:
Cotter Corporation , Commonwealth Edison Company , Exelon Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Nunez v. USA
as 3:2017cv01731
Plaintiff:
Tamia Nunez
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
HACKETT v. CITIBANK, N.A.
as 1:2017cv02700
Defendant:
CITIBANK, N.A.
Plaintiff:
TAMIA HACKETT
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
HACKETT v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
as 1:2017cv02576
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Plaintiff:
TAMIA HACKETT
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
