Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Farr v. Rooms To Go, Inc.
as 8:2026cv02060
Plaintiff:
Tanya Farr
Defendant:
Rooms To Go, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704 Labor Litigation
Talhame v. Ex Parte
as 2:2026cv02554
Plaintiff:
Tanya Talhame
Defendant:
Ex Parte
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Mandingozuluel v. Acker, et al.
as 26-4576
Plaintiff:
ALISHAKA I. MANDINGOZULUEL
Defendant:
TANYA ACKER, Attorney, individual and official capacity, PATRICIA D., Attorney, individual and official capacity, ADAM LEVEY, Attorney, individual and official capacity and others
Dayonta McClinton v. Tanya Walton Pratt
as 26-2481
Petitioner:
DAYONTA MCCLINTON
Respondent:
TANYA WALTON PRATT
US v. Gray
as 26-1806
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
JEFFREY MARTIN GRAY
Interested Party:
CAROL L. HEPBURN, ITF Sloane; I/T/F Solomon, JONES DAY, I/T/F Lily, DEBORAH A. BIANCO, I/T/F Henley; I/T/F Donatello; I/T/F Maureen; I/T/F Ava; I/T/F Pia and others
PORTEE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2026cv02413
Petitioner:
JOHN PORTEE
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, FRANK J. BISIGNANO and SSA Manager Tanya Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Losey v. Shalvoy et al
as 4:2026cv00335
Plaintiff:
Jared Losey
Defendant:
Robert Shalvoy, Loreto Hernandez, Tanya Klock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
