Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Dunlap v. Bradshaw et al
as 2:2026cv00579
Plaintiff:
Sallie Dunlap
Defendant:
Terri Bradshaw, Sabrina Hurley, Diana Weidel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
YOUNG v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 1:2026cv02019
Plaintiff:
TERRI YOUNG
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
CLARK v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 1:2026cv01987
Plaintiff:
TERRY CLARK
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
TERRY v. STROM et al
as 5:2026cv00409
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH TERRY
Defendant:
ASHLEY STROM and MAX HESS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARNOLD v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2026cv00407
Petitioner:
TERRY B ARNOLD
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER and WARDEN SHAWN GILLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv12326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Vanderberg v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2026cv04035
Plaintiff:
Terry Joseph Vanderberg
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Barnes v. Lumford et al
as 5:2026hc02160
Petitioner:
Terry Barnes
Respondent:
Margaret Lumford, Detective White, Detective White's Partner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv03674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
KAMDEM-OUAFFO, PHD
as 3:2026cv12347
Defendant:
LAW OFFICES GERARD M. GREEN, COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY, HILL'S PET NUTRITION INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KAMDEM-OUAFFO, PHD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.