Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01341
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
MACKOWSKI v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv02000
Plaintiff:
TIM MACKOWSKI
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Parraz, et al v. City of Carlsbad, et al
as 26-2154
Plaintiff:
REYNALDO VERA PARRAZ, SR. and ANGELITA SOTO PARRAZ, AKA Angie Soto Parraz
Defendant:
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, a Municipality Existing under the Law of the State of New Mexico, DETECTIVE JOEY LANDGRAF and TIM A. NYCE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-5984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Perez v. Jester et al
as 4:2026cv00938
Plaintiff:
Lynette M Perez
Defendant:
Cole Jester, Tim Griffin, Sharon Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
(PC) Fullerton v. Saxon et al
as 2:2026cv03230
Plaintiff:
Raymond 1061 Fullerton
Defendant:
Tim Saxon, Max Muchlow, Martinelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyquan Gibbs v. AGRI, et al
as 26-5317
Plaintiff:
Tyquan D. Gibbs
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Sasha Gersten-Paal, Patrick A. Penn and others
HANLEY v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2026cv06999
Plaintiff:
TIM HANLEY
Defendant:
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI US SERVICES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sonderling v. Not Your Average Joe Inc et al
as 5:2026cv02457
Plaintiff:
Keith E Sonderling
Defendant:
Not Your Average Joe Inc and Tim Herbel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Burnam v. O'Hare et al
as 4:2026cv01121
Plaintiff:
Lon Burnam
Defendant:
Tim O'Hare and Texas Tarrant County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
