Cases 21 - 30 of 39
ALEXANDER et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv01238
Plaintiff:
RAVELLE ALEXANDER and TROY ALEXANDER
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clanton v. USA
as 3:2016cv01001
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Troy Alexander Clanton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CANUTO v. CARTER et al
as 1:2016cv02282
Plaintiff:
TERESITA A. CANUTO
Defendant:
ASH CARTER, RAY MABUS, PATRICK J. MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Bertling #160326 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2016cv00672
Petitioner:
Troy Alexander Bertling
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CANUTO v. CARTER et al
as 1:2016mc02075
Plaintiff:
TERESITA A. CANUTO
Defendant:
ASH CARTER, RAY MABUS, PATRICK J. MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Alexander et al v. Flint, City of et al
as 2:2016cv13421
Plaintiff:
Troy Alexander , John Armstrong , Mary Dillard and others
Defendant:
Flint, City of, Recievership Transition Advisory Board , Eden Victoria Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
US v. Troy Clanton, Jr.
as 16-4357
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TROY ALEXANDER CLANTON, JR.
Troy Alexander Baetz et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv02820
Plaintiff:
Troy Alexander Baetz and Donald Hyatt Martin
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Does, Mira Hernandez and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Alexander v. The City of Syracuse
as 11-361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Troy Alexander
Defendant:
The County of Onondaga, Kari A. Armstrong and Teaketa Lewis
Defendant - Appellee:
The City of Syracuse and Steven Stonecypher
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
