Cases 1 - 10 of 11,681
Damond v. City of Rayville
as 24-30289
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Defendant:
City of Rayville, Gary Gilley, Individually & in his Official Capacity, Tyler Wade, in his Individual Capacity & Official Capacity and others
McGee v. Andrews et al
as 5:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Eric Jervon McGee
Defendant:
Terry Andrews, E.R. Delta 4 Bunk 47, Walle Delta 4 bunk 41 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swanigan v. Musselwhite et al
as 4:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Terry Swanigan
Defendant:
Musselwhite, Fitzpatrick, Mixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trice v. Unknown et al
as 1:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Trice
Defendant:
Unknown, Chad Nixon, Matt Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Jamie Mills
Defendant:
John Hamm, Terry Raybon, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Betts (PS) v. Long
as 1:2024cv01164
Petitioner:
Terry Betts
Respondent:
Jeff Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAYES v. WELLPATH MEDICAL DEPARTMENT INC. et al
as 1:2024cv05665
Plaintiff:
JAMIE HAYES
Defendant:
WELLPATH MEDICAL DEPARTMENT INC., DOCTOR OXENBERG, TERRY GIANNETTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. BERNARD et al
as 4:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
TAVERRES HENDERSON
Defendant:
TERRY E BERNARD and GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Terry v. USA
as 24-11272
Petitioner:
RICHARD STEPHENS TERRY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
The Estate of Joe Nathan James, Jr. v. Kay Ivey, et al
as 24-11273
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF JOE NATHAN JAMES, JR.
Defendant:
KAY IVEY, JOHN Q. HAMM, TERRY RAYBON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
