Cases 11 - 20 of 33
First Amendment Coalition, et al v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 17-16330
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION OF ARIZONA, INC., CHARLES MICHAEL HEDLUND, GRAHAM S. HENRY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as: John Does - unknown ADC Personnel, in their official capacities as Employees, Contractors, and/or Agents of the Arizona Department of Corrections and GREG FIZER, Warden, ASPC-Florence
WESLEY v. SMITH et al
as 4:2017cv00118
Plaintiff:
JAYLON DEARON WESLEY
Defendant:
TODD SMITH and DONNA TOMPKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. American Behavioral Health Systems
as 2:2016cv00380
Plaintiff:
Christopher Todd Smith
Defendant:
American Behavioral Health Systems
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd Smith v. Warden Dunlap
as 16-7267
Petitioner - Appellant:
TODD SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN DUNLAP
SMITH v. USA
as 1:2015cv00821
Petitioner:
DONALD TODD SMITH
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. Dunlap
as 0:2015cv02538
Petitioner:
Todd Smith
Respondent:
Warden Dunlap
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abessolo v. Smith
as 2:2014cv02168
Petitioner:
Francois Abessolo, r
Respondent:
Todd Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wood et al v. Ryan et al
as 2:2014cv01447
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan , Ron Credio , Lance Hetmer and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rudolph Wood, III , Graham S Henry , David Gulbrandson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. USA
as 1:2014cv00544
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DONALD TODD SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Todd Smith v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 13-14730
Petitioner - Appellant:
TODD SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
