Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Hale v. Tafoya-Lucero et al
as 1:2023cv00413
Plaintiff:
Trae H. Hale and Trae Harrison Hale
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya-Lucero, Department of Corrections State of New Mexico, Deborah Lovato and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Windham et al
as 4:2023cv04032
Plaintiff:
Ruston Yates Russell
Defendant:
Andy Windham, Trae Baker, Kared Ghormley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Windham et al
as 4:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Rustin Yates Russell
Defendant:
Andy Windham, Trae Baker and Kared Ghormley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. CUPP et al
as 2:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
TRAE T. THOMPSON
Defendant:
NURSE L. CUPP, HEATHER, ELKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Neal et al
as 3:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
Trae T Thompson
Defendant:
Ron Neal, B Stovall and Josh Wallen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mose v. US Marshall
as 8:2022cv00107
Petitioner:
Trae Mose
Respondent:
US Marshall
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
COMPTON v. L. RICHARDSON PREYER FEDERAL BUILDING et al
as 1:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
TRAE JAVAR COMPTON
Defendant:
L. RICHARDSON PREYER FEDERAL BUILDING, METROPOLITAN DETENTION CENTER L.A., DOCTOR T. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Chilton County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00777
Plaintiff:
Tabeus Dewayne Robinson
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Ann Davis, Trae Barfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COMPTON v. MILLS et al
as 1:2021cv00811
Plaintiff:
TRAE JAVAR COMPTON
Defendant:
JUDGE J. MILLS and JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COMPTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv00749
Plaintiff:
TRAE JAVAR COMPTON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
